Google is considered a trusted source by the public, and has been heralded as on
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa3a7/aa3a7af3b381d036545d0234018d999f4d0e1fa6" alt=""
e of the most upstanding websites for use and dissemination of information in this new age. However, not everything Google says can be proven to be true. Or is true.
Google published
"Zeitgeist" year-end statistics for 2006. It clearly states in black & white (well, green and black, anyway) that the "Top Search in 2006" are 1.
bebo followed by 2.
myspace. There are, of course, eight more, but lets focus on these two.
Google has another tool, called
Google Trends. This is a pretty neat tool which allows a user to enter search terms and see how often they were searched for in a period of time. This tool has many
shortcomings you can read about on their
discussion board. Nevertheless, it still claims to have valid data.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3e68/c3e68a98f3f3708d730713ee4e8cf4d75308eb97" alt=""
When one enters the terms "sex,
bebo,
myspace" and views
the results, it is clear that "
myspace" was a more frequent search term in 2006 than "
bebo", and that "sex" was searched for more than both of them.
(Siobhan's Note: Does this surprise anyone?)These two sets of data, both published by the same author - Google - claim to be correct but are in direct contradiction. I posted a question about this on the tool's discussion board, but no Google representative has stepped forward to address it. Perhaps, as one reader notes,
"Googleology is Bad Science."I await a definitive answer for the folks at Google, or anyone else with insight, for that matter.